首页> 外文OA文献 >Aerosol Properties Computed from Aircraft-Based Observations During the ACE-Asia Campaign: 2. A Case Study of Lidar Ratio Closure
【2h】

Aerosol Properties Computed from Aircraft-Based Observations During the ACE-Asia Campaign: 2. A Case Study of Lidar Ratio Closure

机译:基于飞机的气溶胶特性计算 aCE-asia活动期间的观察:2。案例 激光雷达比率闭合研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For a vertical profile with three distinct layers (marine boundary, pollution, and dust layers), observed during the ACE-Asia campaign, we carried out a comparison between the modeled lidar ratio vertical profile and that obtained from co-located airborne NASA AATS-14 sunphotometer and shipborne Micro-Pulse Lidar (MPL) measurements. The vertically resolved lidar ratio was calculated from two size distribution vertical profiles—one obtained by inversion of sunphotometer-derived extinction spectra, and one measured in-situ—combined with the same refractive index model based on aerosol chemical composition. The aerosol model implies single scattering albedos of 0.78–0.81 and 0.93–0.96 at 0.523 μm (the wavelength of the lidar measurements), in the pollution and dust layers, respectively. The lidar ratios calculated from the two size distribution profiles agree closely in the dust layer; they are however, significantly lower than the lidar ratios derived from combined lidar and sunphotometer measurements. Uncertainties in aerosol size distributions and refractive index only partly explain these differences, suggesting that particle nonsphericity in this layer is an additional explanation. In the pollution layer, the two size distribution profiles yield lidar ratios that agree within the estimated uncertainties. The retrieved size distributions result in a lidar ratio which is in closer agreement with that derived from lidar/sunphotometer measurements in this layer, with still large differences at certain altitudes (the largest relative difference was 46%).We explain these differences by non-uniqueness of the result of the size distribution retrieval, by a lack of information on the mixing state of particles, and the vertical variability of the particle refractive index.
机译:对于在ACE-Asia战役期间观察到的具有三个不同层(海洋边界层,污染层和尘埃层)的垂直剖面,我们对模拟的激光雷达比垂直剖面与从同一地点的机载NASA AATS- 14日光度计和船载微脉冲激光雷达(MPL)测量。垂直分辨的激光雷达比是根据两种尺寸分布的垂直分布图(一种是通过反光光度计得出的消光光谱获得的,另一种是原位测量的)与基于气溶胶化学成分的相同折射率模型相结合而得出的。气溶胶模型意味着在污染层和尘埃层中,在0.523μm(激光雷达测量的波长)处,单散射反射率分别为0.78–0.81和0.93–0.96。由两个尺寸分布曲线计算得出的激光雷达比在粉尘层中非常吻合。但是,它们远低于从组合的激光雷达和日光光度计测量得出的激光雷达比率。气溶胶粒径分布和折射率的不确定性只能部分解释这些差异,这表明该层中的颗粒非球形性是另一种解释。在污染层中,两个大小分布图得出的激光雷达比值在估计的不确定性范围内一致。检索到的尺寸分布会导致激光雷达比与该层的激光雷达/日光光度计测量值更接近,在某些高度上仍存在较大差异(最大相对差异为46%)。由于缺乏有关粒子混合状态的信息以及粒子折射率的垂直变化,因此粒度分布检索结果的唯一性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号